Was 9/11 an Inside Job?
There have been many theories about the attacks of 9/11. For instance, did they happen by accident? Or were there some sort of inside job that allowed the attacks to happen?
The WTC buildings were not adequately equipped to resist the fires
When the World Trade Center buildings were struck by hijacked planes on September 11, 2001, many people were killed and thousands more were injured. The resulting fire caused the buildings to collapse. Its burning reached temperatures of over 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit, and copious amounts of black smoke enveloped the area. Many people died trying to escape the towers.
The buildings’ perimeter columns were severely damaged. Deformed steel buckled under load and gave way, causing them to fall. Several walls of the WTC were also destroyed. Some reports indicate that a secondary fire lasted more than an hour before the collapse.
The south tower fell at 9:58 a.m., with the top 30 stories twisted to the east. People below the point of impact had to fight through collapsed ceilings and partitions. There was a harrowing escape.
The “A” stairwell in the south tower survived the attacks. However, there were no fourth stairwells in the buildings. A fourth stairwell was code-mandated, but the New York Port Authority chose not to include it.
One hundred and fifty thousand tons of steel supported the WTC towers. The building was not designed to withstand the fires of 9/11. In addition, the buildings were not designed for secondary fire.
Speculation surrounding the cause of the collapse and the failure of the fire suppression equipment has been widespread. Scientists and engineers have attempted to understand the causes. They have provided a range of qualitative and quantitative explanations.
Regardless of what the causes are, one thing is certain: there will be changes in the building codes. As a result, structural members of the buildings may be strengthened to better resist fires.
Another issue that will be examined is the need for emergency communication systems. These systems need to be faster and safer. This will include improved egress routes and better protection against smoke inhalation.
The WTC buildings were brought down in a stealth demolition
In the months leading up to 9/11, there was a lot of speculation about the possible cause of the collapse of the Twin Towers and the subsequent destruction of the Pentagon. There were conspiracy theories that claimed the buildings were brought down in a stealth demolition. This theory was supported by politicians like Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura, former actors Ed Asner and Daniel Sunjata, talkshow host Rosie O’Donnell, and even Willie Nelson.
The truth was that the WTC towers were brought down by fire. According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), fire was the primary factor behind the collapse of the two towers. However, this is not a consensus among structural engineers. Rather, experts agree that a pyroclastic flow of hot gases is likely the cause of the collapse.
There was some discussion as to whether or not the burning jet fuel that atomized on impact weakened the steel structure of the WTC. It was estimated that the fires on the towers reached about 1000 degrees Celsius.
While some people have suggested that the burning jet fuel was the cause of the collapse, there is no evidence to support this. Additionally, NIST has found that the steel from the WTC 7 was not recognizable during recovery efforts.
Some have also suggested that the use of explosives would have been required to bring the building down. However, this is a conspiracy theory that has been widely debunked by experts.
Despite this, the controlled demolition theory still has supporters. They claim that many people foresaw the need to demolish the building. Even the government paid for asbestos removal.
However, the controlled demolition theory was not able to account for all of the physical evidence. Consequently, its advocates have been criticized by the mainstream press.
Thermitic material was used to weaken the structure before it collapsed
One of the more controversial aspects of the WTC is the fact that the buildings collapsed with little to no warning. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but it does raise some questions. For example, why did the fires on the building’s fifth and ninth floors burn so hot? What’s the probability that diesel fuel was the culprit?
There are other things to be found in the debris of the world’s tallest towers. It’s one thing to have a lot of concrete pulverized; it’s another to have a lot of it ejected at high velocity. The building’s footprint was roughly 370 metres wide. But the question remains, what did it take to get that far?
A number of experts have weighed in on the question. Some have offered a number of competing theories. Others claim that a controlled demolition was the only viable option. They may or may not be correct. In any case, it’s a good idea to learn more about the incident and how it unfolded in order to prevent it from happening again.
One theory that is gaining steam is that the WTC buildings were partially fueled by diesel fuel. It’s certainly feasible that this was the case. However, the evidence is thin, with only one solitary witness. Other factors to consider include the fact that the aforementioned fuel source wasn’t available at all times, and there’s no reliable information on how the fuel was transported to the building.
The octave towers may have been the high-tech of the day, but a few savvy aficionados have found a few ways to get at the heart of the matter.
The “round” debris was not the wheel of the alleged jetliner
It’s no secret that the hijacked airliner blasted into the World Trade Center towers was a tragic event. Thousands of lives were lost. But was it really worth all the blood shed and the resulting splintering of the city’s civic fabric? Possibly yes and maybe no, but that’s the debate for a different day. The other question is what happened to the survivors and their loved ones and how? Not to mention the squatters who didn’t make it to the other end of the spectrum. For this reason, the postmortem is a topic of ol’e time and we’re going to discuss some of the more nefarious entrants in the next installment of our postmortem series. This is a rite of passage for some members of the family, as it demonstrates how much the unruly horde has reshaped the landscape in a less than ideal manner.
What ails the city is that some members of the postmortem have been tainting the memory of the good guys by pointing out the obvious and downright dubious claims. Hence, it’s a matter of appointing a panel of unbiased jurors to the task of dissecting the shards and making an unbiased decision in a transparent and dignified manner.
The government’s explanation for the attacks is at record levels
The government’s explanation for the September 11 attacks is now at record levels. There are still many gaps and uncertainties about the events that occurred. But, as we all know, the attacks were the deadliest terrorism incidents in the United States. Hundreds of thousands of people died in New York City, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. A number of planes were hijacked and crashed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who was an associate of bin Laden in the 1980s and 1990s, was the primary operational planner of the 9/11 attacks. He joined the Muslim Brotherhood at age 16. As a teenager, he traveled to Pakistan and Afghanistan. In 1996, he met bin Laden in Tora Bora, Afghanistan.
Bin Ladin’s message of violence was clear. He warned of another attack. However, there was no proof he gave the order to carry out the attack.
Al Qaeda had many sources of funding. Its annual budget was $30 million in the months before the September 11 attacks. Many of its members had training and experience as pilots.
Before 9/11, the threat of Islamist terrorism was increasing. The CIA’s ability to disrupt al Qaeda’s activities abroad was limited.
The Clinton administration was determined to capture or kill bin Laden. It developed covert operations to do so. They also launched cruise missile strikes against al Qaeda targets in Sudan and Afghanistan.
But the attack was more complex than the plans set in motion. There were several components that were missing from the plans, including the ten hijacked planes that would hit the west coast. The military was unprepared to defend the nation’s airspace.
Despite this, the civilian and military defenders of the nation’s airspace attempted to improvise effective homeland defense.